CIA's War Against the Family Unit
Satanist Anton LaVey and Leslie Wexner played for the same team but no one noticed, even after the arrest and alleged "suicide" of Jeffrey Epstein
Would your mind be blown if I told you Satanist Anton LaVey and Leslie Wexner were in fact both tools of CIA mind control against the masses?
I will be sharing snippets of information written by a couple of different sources although my series ‘Deconstructing Wexner’ (Part One, “Child Sacrifice, begins here) is a must read for a true understanding of this complex and multi-generational plan.
Below are a couple of snippets written by just a few people who seem to have had an insight into what CIA was doing through, for example, their much coveted asset Gloria Steinem.
Since the posts were primarily written on message boards, it’s difficult to cite them. However, my goal was to see if people were wise to what CIA, on behalf of the elite families and multinationals they serve, knew the methods they employed to control the populace. The result was very few individuals realized the deception or even how the persons (like the three I’ve named) were used to achieve these goals. Among these the intentional destruction of the family unit. For if the family is destroyed (which they accomplished) then both men and women are considerably weakened and easier to control. The emphasis on certain words is mine.
In 1966, a young American occultist named Anton LaVey founded the Church of Satan in California. While the name of his church alone was controversial, that was just the beginning.
From hosting wild orgies to publishing a Satanic Bible, Anton LaVey became infamous in the press as the “Black Pope” and the “evilest man in the world.” Though LaVey was actually an atheist at heart, he wanted to celebrate Satan as a symbol of human liberation and freedom.
And then there’s this:
The "feminism" social engineering op goes way, way back. Along the way, Adam Weishaupt, who founded of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, said this:
There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.
Frankly, he could have said it in 1966 and it would not have been at all out of place.
The key is to understand CIA did not fund Steinem out in the open. Why? Because it is not legal for CIA to engage in domestic operations. However, once you study real history (which is difficult to do, but which is the core of my attempts to share via this medium) versus the nonsense taught in schools, you’ll come to realize they’ve done just this since their inception.
People on the populist right often claim that the CIA funded feminism to "break up the family." Aaron Russo made this argument to Alex Jones, claiming that David Rockefeller told him this personally (he was apparently friends with David).
These people point out that the CIA has never been purely about "protecting American interests" but was founded by a bunch of wall street bankers and lawyers. Originally intended as an intelligence gathering agency, it was quickly subsumed by the "OPC" or Office for Policy Coordination, which specialized in dirty tricks. It was not in "America's interest" to overthrow the mildly progressive government of Guatemala, but United Fruit had close links to the agency.
And, then, there’s this:
Let’s pretend for a moment that we are elite and hellbent on a one-world government and totalitarian control, I believe our #1 priority should be destroying the family unit. The family unit represents the greatest threat to the state because a functional family unit is self-sufficient and NOT reliant on the state for support and/or guidance. Growing up with a functional family your odds of succumbing to anti-social behavior and/or deviant behavior are significantly decreased. Your educational success and the chances of you reproducing and providing a stable childhood for your offspring significantly increase.
To destroy the self-sufficient family you make the women or moms of the family question their role by making their role seem prison-like, or oppressive. Social media, TV, Hollywood, and MSM all push this agenda either subliminally or overtly. This, coupled with the fact that our women are now forced to work out of the home for purely financial reasons, creates an atmosphere where the mother of the self-sufficient family unit is absent at increasing rates for their own “independence”. Contrary to current popular social structures, from a purely biological standpoint you must admit that the woman in our species is not only meant to bear the young, but to care for the young too.
On the left is Norman Rockwell’s 1950 painting titled American Family and on the right is one of many pornographic images used by Wexner-owned Abercrombie & Fitch (A&E).
To destroy the self-sufficient family you make the men or fathers of the family start questioning their role as providers by reducing the testosterone hormone and focusing on demasculinizing. This can be accomplished through pornography, social media, TV, Hollywood, and MSM by pushing the narrative that man’s natural tendencies to protect and provide are toxic. Then there are certain parts of the male demographic that are taken out of their homes and put into the criminal justice system mostly due to the ever-increasing threat of poverty.
Deconstructing Wexner series links:
Part One, Part Two, Part Three, Part Four, Part Five, Part Six, Part Seven, Part Eight
"LaVey" and Wexner are Steinem are linked together by "Lilith" of the Hebrew bible but the figure dates back to the time of Babylon. Not coincidentally, "Lilith" was one of the names proposed for the MOCKINGBIRD-type media project that came to be known as "Ms." which itself is word-magic rejection of marriage. Its "Wonder Woman" early cover art was the creation of a polyamorous psychologist William Marston (British-cast biopic appeared a few years ago) who also was committed to SM; hence the "magic" lasso used by WW for "rope play." Tay Tay Swift bears a strong resemblance to one of LaVey's daughters and successor. Looking forward to learning more connections that tie (pun intended) these miscreants together with "intelligence."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karla_LaVey